This should indeed not be an issue with that it framework; Sir John de- Keith d

This should indeed not be an issue with that it framework; Sir John de- Keith d

Re: ? Comyn spouse of Malise

Towards Comyn child who had been spouse out of Malise of Strathearn, I’d theorized in 2005 that she was Margaret, defined as partner out of Sir John de- Keith (get a hold of copy out-of blog post lower than) who had been 2ndly age are offered because article: the latest spouse Emma I recommend try of some other family, and not mom of 2nd Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sandwich _Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan_ , claims simply, ‘Malise, Earl regarding Strathearn, got a spouse Emma, in 1261-1267, whose surname was unknown ‘[SP II:256, cites Cal. out of Docs., i. 2383, 2451]. some time ahead of 1270, https://kissbrides.com/american-women/austin-nv/ in order that their widow (Margaret) could have been “available” a bit shortly after Emma.

This was needless to say a conjecture; it can have the benefit of coping with a well-known relationships anywhere between Muriel Keith and you may Reginald ce Cheyne. Anymore relevant documentation do however be greeting.

The fresh new membership during the Scots Peerage regarding the family of Keith says from Sir John de Keith (d. california. 1270) that he was thought to has married Comyn, earl out-of Buchan . It identification, of your unclear (“considered have been”) variety, may now getting fixed according to research by the pursuing the dispensation, old from the Fondi into the fourteen Jan 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, 50 On bishop from Moray. Professors in order to distribute Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you may Murielle, damselle, d de Keth, regarding Moray and you will Aberdeen dioceses, on obstacle in order to wedding as a result of the 3rd and you may next degrees of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step 1. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, zero. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the near future next spouse away from Robert Stewart, very first Duke off Albany (d. 1420), is contracted in order to get married Reginald ce Cheyne, son away from Sir Reginald ce Cheyne by the his spouse (given that her very first husband), Helen out of Strathearn. If you’re you can find celebrated gaps from the ancestry out of Muriel Keith, she and Reginald ce Cheyne carry out display a lineage regarding the Comyns. not, this is too faraway to need good dispensation if the Muriel is a beneficial-great-high grandd Comyn, Earl from Buchan (d. 1233), which will end up being the instance when the ‘s the reason child.

2. Reginald ce Cheyne was a good-grandson out of Marjory Comyn, child from Alexander Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan (d. 1290), young buck regarding William Comyn in the above list. Her child was Malise, Earl out-of Strathearn regarding 1312 to help you his passing in the 1328 , and pops regarding Reginald.

ca. 1270), is same as Marjory Comyn, and you may partnered 2ndly to help you Malise, Earl off Strathearn (d. 1312). This should imply this new parentage a€?considered keeps been’ regarding Margaret, wife away from Sir John de Keith, try out of you to generation: she’d not have already been the new d Comyn, Earl out of Buchan, but instead off his young man Alexander. There’s no evidence that Earl Malise and you will Marjory Comyn was in fact partnered far in advance of 1275: as the Lindsay published,

There’s one discernable basis about what the relationship ranging from Reginald le Cheyne and you can Muriel Keith will have lived: in the event the Margaret Comyn, partner out of Sir John de Keith (d

‘ New wife of this earl, on 1275, is called Marjory, even as we comprehend the attesting term out of Zero. curriculum vitae., which is stated by the Wyntoun, Guide VIII. guy. vi., getting become next aunt out of John Comyn, Earl from Buchan, exactly who negotiated with respect to Earl Malise the marriage settlement above said [old at the London, April twenty six, 1293 having their child Matilda and you will Robert de Tony, son off Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = E de- Quincy Elizabeth regarding Buchan We __________________I________________ We III 1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de Keith I (als We Elizabeth out-of Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) We d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ We We I I We I Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de- Keith de- Keith Elizabeth from = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de Tony I ______I_______________________ We We I I Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de E out-of Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. california. 1343 We ce Cheyne We I We = 2) Sir David I V I I de Graham Sir William de- I I__________ Keith We I = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We I I III We I I I Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith ce Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke regarding Albany)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *