This will indeed not a problem with that it construction; Sir John de- Keith d

This will indeed not a problem with that it construction; Sir John de- Keith d

Re: ? Comyn partner off Malise

In regards to the Comyn daughter who was simply spouse of Malise out-of Strathearn, I had theorized when you look at the 2005 one to she had been Margaret, identified as spouse out of Sir John de Keith (find duplicate from article less than) who was 2ndly e are supplied in this post: the brand new spouse Emma I will suggest are of another household members, rather than mom of 2nd Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sandwich _Comyn, Earl of Buchan_ , claims to some extent, ‘Malise, Earl off Strathearn, had a spouse Emma, during the 1261-1267, whose surname is unfamiliar ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. away from Docs., we. 2383, 2451]. some time in advance of 1270, so as that their widow (Margaret) would-have-been “available” some time just after Emma.

This is however a conjecture; it can feel the advantage of working with a known relationships anywhere between Muriel Keith and you can Reginald le Cheyne. Any longer associated files create needless to say feel acceptance.

The account in the Scots Peerage concerning family of Keith says out-of Sir John de Keith (d. california. 1270) he are said to features hitched Comyn, earl out-of Buchan . It character, of one’s undecided (“believed to were”) range, may now getting fixed according to research by the following dispensation, old at Fondi toward fourteen Jan 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, 50 Towards bishop of Moray. Professors so you’re able to distribute Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you may Murielle, damselle, d de Keth, away from Moray and you can Aberdeen dioceses, in the Haiti kvinnor till salu obstacle so you’re able to marriage due to the next and fourth degrees of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step 1. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, no. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the long run second spouse out-of Robert Stewart, 1st Duke regarding Albany (d. 1420), is developed to marry Reginald ce Cheyne, young man out of Sir Reginald le Cheyne of the his partner (since their unique earliest husband), Helen out of Strathearn. When you are you can find renowned gaps throughout the ancestry of Muriel Keith, she and Reginald ce Cheyne do show a descent from the Comyns. Although not, this really is also distant to need a dispensation if Muriel is an effective-great-great grandd Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan (d. 1233), that would be the case in the event that ‘s the reason child.

2. Reginald le Cheyne is a-grandson out of Marjory Comyn, child out-of Alexander Comyn, Earl of Buchan (d. 1290), young man out of William Comyn in the above list. Their particular son try Malise, Earl of Strathearn out-of 1312 so you’re able to his passing from inside the 1328 , and parent from Reginald.

ca. 1270), was same as Marjory Comyn, and married 2ndly so you can Malise, Earl regarding Strathearn (d. 1312). This would imply the latest parentage a€?said to features been’ that of Margaret, spouse regarding Sir John de- Keith, are regarding that age bracket: she would n’t have started the brand new d Comyn, Earl away from Buchan, but rather regarding his son Alexander. There is no proof one to Earl Malise and Marjory Comyn were hitched much ahead of 1275: just like the Lindsay blogged,

You will find you to definitely discernable foundation about what the partnership ranging from Reginald le Cheyne and you may Muriel Keith will have stayed: if the Margaret Comyn, spouse out of Sir John de- Keith (d

‘ This new wife of this earl, in the 1275, is entitled Marjory, while we understand the attesting term away from No. curriculum vitae., and is stated of the Wyntoun, Publication VIII. guy. vi., to own come the second cousin regarding John Comyn, Earl from Buchan, just who discussed for Earl Malise the wedding payment significantly more than said [old at the London, April 26, 1293 for his daughter Matilda and you will Robert de Tony, young buck out-of Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = E de Quincy Age away from Buchan We __________________I________________ I III step one) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de Keith I (als We Elizabeth away from Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) I d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ We We We I We I Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de Keith de- Keith E regarding = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de- Tony We ______I_______________________ We I I We Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de- Age of Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. ca. 1343 I le Cheyne I I I = 2) Sir David I V We I de Graham Sir William de We We__________ Keith I I = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ I We We III We We I I Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith ce Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke of Albany)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *